SubEx
Sodium·Recover faster·finding 18 of 19
–
★☆☆Contested — the evidence disagrees with itself, or the finding carries a caution. A caution or conflict always shows one star, however strong the sources are.

Physical & body · no significant effect · contested

Nearly every runner took salt, and sodium still fell too low

In a 161 km mountain ultramarathon, 94 in 100 runners took salt capsules and one finisher in fifteen still ended below the line. How much they took did not separate them.

What the study found

Nearly every runner took salt, and low blood sodium happened anyway

The comparison is more salt against less, not salt against none. In a 161 kilometre mountain ultramarathon, 94 in 100 runners took salt capsules and one finisher in fifteen still ended below the line, with the amount taken not separating them. Five desert ultramarathons found the same.

The caveat · Runners picked their own salt dose

Nobody was randomised: runners chose their own salt and their own drinking, so everything else they did differently comes along with the comparison. Intake was reconstructed from a questionnaire filled in after the race. Almost everyone supplemented, 94 in 100, which leaves barely any unsupplemented group at all, so this says more salt did not protect rather than that salt does nothing. Self-selected ultramarathon fields, single races.

What we don't know

Whether deliberately taking salt changes the risk of low blood sodium in endurance races is untested. Nobody has randomised runners to salt or none, because in these races almost everyone already takes it.