SubEx

Vitamin

L-Methylfolate (5-MTHF)

5-MTHF, the pre-activated form sold on the strength of the MTHFR gene, and the one form no neural tube defect trial has ever tested.

Findings
3
Best evidence
★★☆
Open questions
2

At a glance

Myth check

If you carry the MTHFR gene variant you cannot process folic acid properly, so you need the methylated form instead.

Randomised head to head in healthy women, 416 micrograms of methylfolate lowered homocysteine no better than 400 micrograms of ordinary folic acid. Carrying the C677T variant does track with higher neural tube defect risk in pooled case-control data, but no trial has shown that carriers do better on methylfolate than on folic acid at preventing one. The trial built to compare the two forms before conception has not begun reporting.

The variant is real and the folate chemistry is real. What is missing is the step in between, the trial showing that swapping forms changes an outcome anyone cares about, and that missing step is where the price difference lives.

The findingsStrongest first
Sexual & reproductiveThe gene behind the supplement marketing is real

Across 19 case-control studies of 2228 affected babies and 4220 controls, the fetal C677T version of MTHFR, the enzyme that activates folate, was commoner in affected babies.

★★☆Single study — solid evidence, such as one good trial or a large observational dataset, but not replicated at the top tier.A risk factor is not a diagnosis, and nothing here shows that carriers need a different supplement or a different dose. Pooled case-control genetic studies are prone to small-study effects and to population mismatch between cases and controls, so a significant pooled result is much weaker than the same result from trials. No odds ratio is reported, so the size of the association cannot be stated. The association did not hold in mixed populations, and nobody has explained why.Click to keep this openSupport a healthy pregnancy
Mood & wellbeingTwo trials of the same design gave opposite answers

The first, in 148 people whose antidepressant had not worked, escalated the dose and found nothing. The second gave 75 people 15mg throughout and beat placebo on both main outcomes.

★☆☆Contested — the evidence disagrees with itself, or the finding carries a caution. A caution or conflict always shows one star, however strong the sources are.CautionOnly the positive trial tends to get quoted. The dose difference is the authors' own explanation for the split, but it is a comparison across two separate studies rather than a randomised test of dose, and the trial that worked had 75 patients. The 15mg used is roughly forty times a periconceptional folate dose and is a prescription medical food in the United States, not the supplement sold to consumers on the same reasoning.Click to keep this openSupport mood
OtherThe premium folate did not beat the cheap one

Over 24 weeks in 144 women, 416 micrograms of methylfolate lowered homocysteine no more than 400 micrograms of plain folic acid. Doubling the methylfolate dose did not move it further.

★☆☆Contested — the evidence disagrees with itself, or the finding carries a caution. A caution or conflict always shows one star, however strong the sources are.Conflicting evidenceHomocysteine is a blood marker, not a birth outcome: this trial says nothing about whether either form prevents a neural tube defect. The 144 women were split across four arms, so each is small, and none was selected by genotype, which is the comparison the marketing claim actually turns on. A co-author affiliation with the maker of the methylated preparation is worth checking before the result is quoted in either direction.Click to keep this openSupport a healthy pregnancy
Sources4 behind this page

What we don't know

2 open questions